Dr. Chynn corrects misinformation about Lasek

Vinayak A:    From what I understand, Lasek was developed as an alternative for patients whose cornea’s are either too thin or too steep for Lasik.  Its benefits, aside from no cutting, also includes less alterations to the structural integrity of the cornea, reducing the risk of trauma during and after operation.  Though risks are prevalent in both procedures, LASEK is the clear winner over LASIK.Dr. Chynn:  Risks are not “prevalent” in both procedures.  The risk of a major complication is 1 in 1000 for LASIK, for LASEK it’s more like 1 in 10,000.  We do not consider an over or under-correction a complication, as it can be easily fixed by a little bit more laser.

Vinayak A:  As for myself, however, I still wouldn’t get the procedure.  I don’t mind wearing contacts and enjoy the different color options given to me.  I’d probably still wear contacts even if I had perfect 20/20 vision.  Dr. Chynn:  You can still wear colored contacts afterwards, if you want.

Vinayak A:  On top of which, only 80% of our population generally meets the criteria to receive the operation. 

Dr. Chynn:  This is false; about 99% of patients currently wearing glasses or contacts can have the same or better/more accurate prescription put on their eyes with the laser.

Emil William Chynn, MD FACS MBA

This entry was posted on Monday, October 6th, 2008 at 8:15 am and is filed under About Park Avenue Laser Vision. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.